Key Takeaways
Dementia affects over 6 million U.S. adults, with incidence rising due to aging trends, doubling risk every 5 years post-65.
ECT shows promise in managing dementia's behavioral symptoms, despite no FDA-approved treatments, with nonrandomized studies indicating symptom improvement.
Retrospective analyses suggest ECT may improve neuropsychiatric symptoms without worsening cognitive function, supporting its potential use.
Clinical considerations for ECT include consent, comorbidities, and airway management, emphasizing thorough evaluation of patient-specific factors.
Dementia is among the most debilitating neurodegenerative disorders related to aging. More than 6 million adults in the United States have dementia, and both the prevalence and the incidence rates of dementia are expected to rise quickly because of aging trends. The risk of dementia doubles every 5 years after the age of 65 years, and this increases to almost 50% in adults 90 years or older. Individuals with dementia often experience both psychological and behavioral symptoms, including depression, agitation, irritability, apathy, hallucinations, and delusions.
There are currently no treatments approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Nonpharmacological behavioral interventions are often recommended, but these can be difficult to implement in a standardized way and require substantial resources. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been shown to be very effective as a treatment for severe depression (without dementia). Some clinicians have used ECT as a therapy in severe cases to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Here we review the evidence for the use of ECT to manage those symptoms.
Randomized Trials
For any proposed therapy or intervention, the gold-standard level of evidence comes from randomized, controlled trials. As of October 23, 2023, there were no completed randomized trials of ECT in patients with dementia. A list of clinical trials of ECT use in patients with comorbid depression and dementia is in the Table. An ongoing, multisite trial (NCT03926520) in which patients with dementia are treated with ECT and usual care proposes to enroll 50 patients and aims to be completed in 2024.
There have been 2 prospective, nonrandomized (single group) trials of ECT in dementia that have been completed. In one of these studies, patients were enrolled prospectively and were all treated with ECT. This study (NCT01856010) enrolled inpatients with dementia complicated by severe agitation and aggression who did not benefit from either pharmacological or nonpharmacological interventions. Most of these patients (78.3%) exhibited significantly reduced agitation from baseline to discharge as measured by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, a common assessment of agitation in dementia.
The neuropsychiatric inventory scores also significantly decreased from baseline to discharge, indicating an improvement in memory (P < .001). Further, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale scores changed from a rating of “markedly agitated/aggressive” at baseline to a rating of “borderline agitated/aggressive” at discharge. There was no change in functioning (daily living) before or after ECT. Five of 23 patients discontinued treatment, with 3 patients stopping due to adverse events (2 for confusion/delirium, 1 for atrial fibrillation) and 2 patients stopping due to poor clinical response.
Another study (NCT02969499) recruited 33 individuals with dementia who were treated with ECT. In this study, patients exhibited improvement in neuropsychiatric functioning a week following a course of ECT and an improvement in agitation 8 weeks following ECT. There was no discernible worsening in cognitive functioning or dementia symptoms.
Retrospective Analyses
Many reports of the use of ECT for comorbid dementia and depression or for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia are in the form of a case series. Rao and Lyketsos reviewed the medical records of 31 patients with primary dementia who also experienced depression. Compared with before ECT, these patients had lower depression severity scores (12.3 points on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) and an overall improvement on the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (1.6 points; P < .02).
One of the larger studies on the use of ECT in patients with depression and dementia was conducted using Medicare claims data. In this study, 145 patients who received ECT were matched to a control cohort (N = 415) with respect to age, sex, principal diagnosis, medical comorbidities, and baseline scores of activities of daily living. All patients were hospitalized initially and followed for up to 1 year after discharge.
This study found that, among those with dementia who were admitted to the hospital for a psychiatric problem, all patients generally declined in their functional status following discharge. Those patients receiving ECT had more favorable summary scores of activities of daily living compared with the control cohort, although the effects were small.
Of note, those receiving ECT did not experience a differential worsening in their cognitive function. This is in line with another recent retrospective study of ECT in 313 patients with baseline mild to moderate cognitive impairment, which showed an improvement in cognitive functioning as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. This finding concurs with an older report of 44 patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia who underwent ECT and showed no worsening in cognitive deficits irrespective of preexisting cognitive status.
Clinical Considerations
Given the lack of effective therapies for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in those with mild cognitive impairment and the profound burden that these symptoms cause to patients and families, it is reasonable to use ECT in select cases. In each case, a thorough analysis of the potential benefits and risks of therapy needs to be conducted and discussed with consenting parties. A few clinical considerations are worth mentioning.
First, the issue of consent is paramount. The laws governing consent for ECT are administered at the state level, which means requirements vary considerably across the United States. A thorough and legal consent process needs to be carried out prior to therapy initiation, including an appeal to judicial authorities where required. Careful consideration must be given to the level of cognitive impairment and how this affects the patient’s ability to consent, as well as to local laws and regulations.
Second is the consideration of comorbid medical issues. Individuals with dementia and cognitive impairment are often advanced in age and have many medical comorbidities. For some older individuals of a frail medical status, an acute series schedule of 2 treatments per week (as opposed to 3 times per week) can allow for a more tolerable treatment course.
Another consideration involves management of the airway. Sometimes patients with dementia have difficulty managing secretions. The judicious use of an anticholinergic medication (eg, glycopyrrolate) can help improve the safety of airway management during the periprocedural time.
Concluding Thoughts
Large database analyses of thousands of patients have essentially ruled out the possibility that ECT causes dementia. Further research involving smaller groups of patients with dementia or cognitive impairment has also supported the reassuring conclusion that ECT does not worsen baseline dementia or cognitive impairment. In fact, some data suggest an improvement in cognitive function following ECT.
Where resources are available, where patient and family preferences and clinical considerations provide, and when potential benefits outweigh the risks, ECT can be considered in select cases to manage the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Note: This article originally appeared on Psychiatric Times.
Comentarios